current-users: Re: lpd/hosts.lpd archaic?

Subject: Re: lpd/hosts.lpd archaic?
To: None <greywolf@starwolf.com>
From: Takahiro Kambe <taca@back-street.net>
List: current-users
Date: 11/20/2002 11:06:45

Correction.

In message <200211200205.gAK25Gs00446@edge.back-street.net>
	on Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:05:16 +0900,
	Takahiro Kambe <taca@back-street.net> wrote:
> In message <Pine.NEB.4.44.0211191331010.802-100000@lothlorien.starwolf.com>
> 	on Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:39:51 -0800 (PST),
> 	Greywolf <greywolf@starwolf.com> wrote:
> > In particular, it would be really nice for hosts.lpd to be able to handle
> > a network/mask combination, or some other method of access control for
> > lpd.
> Linking lpd(8) with libwrap solves problem?
Adding support for tcpwraper to lpd(8) solves problem?

-- 
Takahiro Kambe <taca@back-street.net>