Subject: Re: Status of NEW_BUFQ_STRATEGY?
To: Markus W Kilbinger <kilbi@rad.rwth-aachen.de>
From: Bang Jun-Young <junyoung@mogua.com>
List: current-users
Date: 11/01/2002 17:16:37
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 05:46:24AM +0100, Markus W Kilbinger wrote:
> >>>>> "enami" == enami tsugutomo <enami@sm.sony.co.jp> writes:
> 
>     enami> Urban Boquist <urban@boquist.net> writes:
>     >> --- trap (number 6) ---
>     >> bufq_prio_get(c07a689c,1,c0420bf0,c02332e6) at bufq_prio_get+0x5b
> 
>     enami> Is this repeatable? I have two machine with this option
>     enami> enabled but it runs without panic (both uses wd).
> 
> It panic's my i386 (dual athlon, wd) and my tibook (macppc, wd), too.

Could you give me more details on how it died? More specifically,

 - was softdep enabled?
 - what was panic message?
 - is it reproducable?

Jun-Young

-- 
Bang Jun-Young <junyoung@mogua.com>