On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:17:11PM -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:41:08AM +1030, Brett Lymn wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:05:25AM +1100, Luke Mewburn wrote:
> > > 
> > > At a minimum, the control program (and associated examples) should be
> > > "veriexecctl" or something like that (instead of "verifiedexec_load").
> > > As for the kernel option name, that's probably OK.
> > > 
> > 
> > Sure, sounds good to me.  I thought that verifiedexec_load was a bit
> > of a mouthful.
> 
> I don't find "veriexecctl" much better, frankly.  It's still hugely long
> and will force ls output into a smaller number of columns, which is
> annoying.  Please pick a more Unixy name.

What about ld_vexec or ld_veriexec?

Jun-Young

-- 
Bang Jun-Young <junyoung@mogua.com>