On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:17:11PM -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
  | On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:41:08AM +1030, Brett Lymn wrote:
  | > On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:05:25AM +1100, Luke Mewburn wrote:
  | > > 
  | > > At a minimum, the control program (and associated examples) should be
  | > > "veriexecctl" or something like that (instead of "verifiedexec_load").
  | > > As for the kernel option name, that's probably OK.
  | > > 
  | > 
  | > Sure, sounds good to me.  I thought that verifiedexec_load was a bit
  | > of a mouthful.
  | 
  | I don't find "veriexecctl" much better, frankly.  It's still hugely long
  | and will force ls output into a smaller number of columns, which is
  | annoying.  Please pick a more Unixy name.

Changing the `ls' output for /sbin (or /usr/sbin) ... ?

I think not; there are already many programs in those directories with
names longer than 11 characters.  c.f
	echo /{usr/,}sbin/????????????*
	/usr/sbin/named-bootconf /usr/sbin/named.reload
	/usr/sbin/named.restart /usr/sbin/netgroup_mkdb
	/usr/sbin/rpc.bootparamd /usr/sbin/rpc.yppasswdd
	/sbin/dhclient-script /sbin/mount_cd9660 /sbin/mount_ext2fs
	/sbin/mount_filecore /sbin/mount_kernfs /sbin/mount_overlay
	/sbin/mount_portal /sbin/mount_procfs