On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:16:28AM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:

 > Unfortunately it seems people are strongly pushing in directions where
 > that option will essentially (though perhaps not actually -- just for
 > what amounts to all intents and purposes) be taken away, even when its
 > not really necessary to do so if some thought is put into the effort
 > now, up-front, before a critical juncture is reached.

Greg .. ALL LONG, we have said that the ability to build with LDSTATIC=static
will remain.  You are either chosen to ignore that just so you can be your
regular annoying self, or just plain don't read all of a post before you
decide to pontificate.

Into my spam filter you go..

-- 
        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>