Subject: Re: HEADS UP: migration to fully dynamic linked "base" system
To: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
From: Noriyuki Soda <soda@sra.co.jp>
List: current-users
Date: 08/26/2002 16:52:59
>>>>> On Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:42:22 +0900, itojun@iijlab.net said:

> 	so, "make build" will do that "mv /lib/libc.so.major.minor /usr/lib"
> 	for us?  if not, it will be an additional labor for people.

For people using official binary release, probably the right thing is
to remove older /lib/libc.so.major.minor, because we will never change
major number of libc.

I'm not sure about what is the right thing for people using binary
snapshot or "make build", though. I guess perhaps the extra labor 
may be acceptable for those people.
--
soda