On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 12:45:15PM -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> On April 17, 2002 01:04 pm, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > I get this message when I try to build any Linux program from pkgsrc.
> > Here is a sample of the actual output.
> >
> > /usr/pkg/emul/linux/sbin/ldconfig -r /usr/pkg/emul/linux
> > FATAL: kernel too old
> > *** Signal 6
> 
> I have tried to find this problem but it seems to be in the Linux binaries.  
> Here is a ktrace I did when I see the problem.
> 
>  21854 ktrace   EMUL  "netbsd"
>  21854 ktrace   RET   ktrace 0
>  21854 ktrace   CALL  execve(0xbfbfda57,0xbfbfd98c,0xbfbfd99c)
>  21854 ktrace   NAMI  "/usr/pkg/emul/linux/sbin/ldconfig"
>  21854 ldconfig EMUL  "linux"
>  21854 ldconfig RET   oldolduname -1 errno -2 No such file or directory
>  21854 ldconfig CALL  [221]
>  21854 ldconfig RET   [221] -1 errno -38 Too many processes
>  21854 ldconfig CALL  fcntl(0,0x1,0)
>  21854 ldconfig RET   fcntl 0
>  21854 ldconfig CALL  fcntl(0x1,0x1,0xbfbfd928)
>  21854 ldconfig RET   fcntl 0
>  21854 ldconfig CALL  fcntl(0x2,0x1,0)
>  21854 ldconfig RET   fcntl 0
>  21854 ldconfig CALL  uname(0xbfbfd750)
>  21854 ldconfig RET   uname 0
>  21854 ldconfig CALL  write(0x2,0x8094d69,0x16)
>  21854 ldconfig GIO   fd 2 wrote 22 bytes
>        "FATAL: kernel too old
>        "
>  21854 ldconfig RET   write 22/0x16
>  21854 ldconfig CALL  rt_sigprocmask(0x1,0xbfbfd5ec,0,0x8)
>  21854 ldconfig RET   rt_sigprocmask 0
>  21854 ldconfig CALL  getpid
>  21854 ldconfig RET   getpid 21854/0x555e
>  21854 ldconfig CALL  kill(0x555e,0x6)
>  21854 ldconfig PSIG  SIGABRT SIG_DFL
>  21854 ldconfig NAMI  "ldconfig.core"
> 
> Am I reading this right that it is a problem with uname emulation?  I tried 
> running a Linux uname binary with the same result.

I don't think it's a problem with the uname emulation. The kernel is just
returning a linux version too old for these binaries.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
--