Sorry, awareness:awakeness < 0.05.

I read too much into it; it looked as though he was saying that since
bounds checking had a price that we should look at other options...

I've been working wayyyy too hard lately, folks.  My bad, my apologies.

On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Peter Seebach wrote:

# I see no evidence of any such plan in Todd's statement; he's merely pointing
# out that there's a *reason* for which C does not mandate bounds checking.
#
# -s




				--*greywolf;
--
NetBSD: your basement or mine?