Subject: Re: X library path, etc.
To: None <current-users@netbsd.org>
From: Peter Seebach <seebs@plethora.net>
List: current-users
Date: 01/14/2002 18:05:49
In message <Pine.NEB.4.33.0201141532430.24622-100000@rivendell.starwolf.com>, G
reywolf writes:
>And it's certainly beyond my comprehension why one has to do -Wl,-R
>but not -Wl,-L (contrasted to the simple -L/-R on other compilers
>(at least one other (sun) comes to mind here)).

The main problem is that many, many, programs assume that "-L" is enough,
so I spend a lot of time editing files.  Perhaps it would be reasonable to
assume that any "-L" implies a corresponding -Wl,-R unless somehow indicated
otherwise.

-s