On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> Yeah, well, "no easy way to..." is a lot better than "not maintained at
> all", which is basically the condition of our in-tree UUCP.  Hell, it's a
> version behind the "latest", where that "latest" was released almost a
> decade ago.

I think what we need is a 'localsrc' tree, where we can keep maintained
(but not part of the base system) software.

Things like UUCP, sendmail, postfix, a pop3 / imap server, etc..

Jared