On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 01:20:27PM -0400, Mason Loring Bliss wrote:
> Right, but isn't being independant of the host platform's tools the idea?
> I'm not sure why we wouldn't want to have make(1) included, especially since
> our build stuff uses at least a bit of custom make functionality.

Yes, of course. The problem is the bootstrap of this: once you've make build,
it's easy. The problem is to get a working make at the first place, using
the build system.

--
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI.           Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr
--