>On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 11:58:51PM -0400, Ken Hornstein wrote:
>> 
>> Does anyone think it still makes sense to stick with bad144?
>> 
>
>Note that some ports, e.g. Amiga, have to use, if at all (see SCSI/IDE 
>bad sector remapping), the format defined by their firmw^H^H^H^H^Hnative 
>OS.

Understood; it sounds like y'all would use something different in that
case.  Although ... one NetBSD was up and running, I don't see a reason
why you _couldn't_ use bad144 (or whatever the hell it ends up being
called).

--Ken