Are you running a -current kernel with an older userland?
	(I can replicate this with a 1.5S kernel and 1.5 userland)

		David/absolute		-- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --


On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:

> I don't understand this at all.  I am running "top -osize" and the first line
> is top itself.
>
>   915 darcy     28    0   276G  760K onproc    0:00  0.00%  0.00% top
>
> Not bad for a 128 MB system with 18GB of disk.  Is this some sort of
> "Virtual, virtual memory?"
>
> Note that the system doesn't seem to be suffering in any way.  The
> only thing that I have done recently is to add some options to my
> kernel config that I had to root in the source to find.
>
> options     SEMMNI=64
> options     SEMMNS=256
>
> Could this be giving me the weird errors?
>
>