Subject: Re: Terrible tar performance on RAID 0 filesystem
To: Greg Oster <oster@cs.usask.ca>
From: Jared D. McNeill <jmcneill@invisible.yi.org>
List: current-users
Date: 03/12/2001 19:04:14 
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Greg Oster wrote:
> What does your disklabel for the RAID set look like?  I'm wondering
> if this could be the "sucky performance due to bad default disklabel values"
> problem reported in PR#11989...

Hmm, I just ran '/sbin/disklabel raid0' and it gave me a message like it
was creating a fresh label. That's not supposed to happen, and I'm pretty
sure the following isn't mine (although I am using raid0d):

8 partitions:
#        size   offset     fstype   [fsize bsize cpg/sgs]
  c:  4999361       63     unused        0     0         # (Cyl.    0*- 78115)
  d:  4999424        0     4.2BSD        0     0     0   # (Cyl.    0 - 78115)
  e:  4999361       63     unused        0     0         # (Cyl.    0*- 78115)