Subject: Re: xterm v. xterm-old
To: gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@eclipsed.net>
From: Geoff Wing <gcw@rxvt.org>
List: current-users
Date: 02/09/2001 03:00:52
gabriel rosenkoetter wrote about Re: xterm v. xterm-old:
:On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 10:48:01AM +1100, Geoff Wing wrote:
:> OK, then if someone has XTerm*Foreground then they also need to
:> include the other colours under the XTerm class, not the VT100 (sub?)class.
:> Well, it worked for me (in 88b, v132 & v150) to also add the following
:> if XTerm*Foreground is set.
:[...]
:You have *got* to be shitting me.
:This should not be necessary just to get reasonable behavior out of
:xterm.

It's not necessary.  As Tom Dickey said, it's just a matter of using
the proper name for the 'foreground' resource (with a small 'f') instead
of the 'Foreground' class.  Otherwise you're setting something different
to what you think.

Regards,
-- 
Geoff Wing : <gcw@pobox.com>
Rxvt Stuff : <gcw@rxvt.org>
Zsh Stuff  : <gcw@zsh.org>