In message <3A7987CF.7DF7637@tampabay.rr.com>, Ken Wellsch writes:
>> Is this Yet Another Nawk?  How many are there?

>I just took a look at the README in the source and am happy to see it
>is THE nawk I knew and loved... in a former life, our department purchased
>it from the AT&T Toolchest, many many years ago.

Cool!  Canonical-nawk.  That may be the only one, I just sort of assumed
we couldn't *possibly* be doing that after all the holy wars about "AT&T
code".

-s