-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Manuel Bouyer wrote:

>So IMHO raidframe (or at last raid-1) has been pretty well tested, and is
>ready for production use.

I'd just like to second this.  I spent a sizable chunk of the last two
years doing consulting and system integration, and the standard `utility
belt' mail/dns server configuration which we developed is based around a
pair of 9 GB drives RAID 1'ed together with RF.

I've rolled out about a half dozen or so such boxes, and my wife and
other consultants at the firm rolled out another half dozen to a dozen.
After various testing to reach an ideal configuration, RF was never a
point of contention in maintaining these boxes.  In fact, we were
_quite_ thrilled to have it.

Now I'm in another line of work, but just wanted to share the
experience/testimonial...

- -- 
				Jim Wise
				jwise@draga.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (NetBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6ZhAj2JhG4/qi8rQRAkETAJ9J7XJeB+OhXLoYjG+kmvxhek0FQQCglnL+
i9uxo6IryW/KTRduaB4TDeo=
=WRXw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----