Jason R Thorpe wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 02:19:46PM +1100, Simon Burge wrote:
> 
>  > The name "esm" has been suggested before, which is more in line with
>  > the existing audio device naming scheme.  However, I'm not attached to
>  > either name - I'm happy to have the laptop make noises!
> 
> Yes, it should be "esm".

  "esm" is fine with me -- I will rename the driver!

> BTW, the Maestro3 will probably need a separate driver, or some

  That's what I was afraid of.  Well, I'll remove the commented-out
MAESTRO3 line in the match function for now. :-(

  Cheers
      ,
   Rene