Subject: RE: Mozilla build...
To: greywolf@starwolf.com, Matt Thomas <matt@3am-software.com>
From: Ryan M. Hurst <ryanh@valicert.com>
List: current-users
Date: 06/19/2000 07:25:56
I thought that Netscape released the PSM into Mozilla. If that's the case
shouldn't you have SSL in the new Mozilla? I have not looked at Mozilla yet
but do a bunch of work with the PSM on netscape. Maybe that was just a move
gettin ready for the September patent releaf of RSA?
Ryan
-----Original Message-----
From: current-users-owner@netbsd.org
[mailto:current-users-owner@netbsd.org]On Behalf Of Greywolf
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2000 11:11 PM
To: Matt Thomas
Cc: current-users@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: Mozilla build...
Lots of good reasons, I see...
Quoth Soren: "My opinion is: screw that :-)"
Saith seebs: "Not all sites I visit need SSL...if I catch a couple of bugs
now, I'm ahead of the game."
Erat dictum Matt Thomas:
# So the build will be done by the expiration date? (at least
# for some of the faster platforms) :)
I asked my question simply because I *do* have something of a need for
SSL. Screwing that is not an option. Seebs has a valid point, one which
I hadn't caught.
But Matt, you one very funny person (sic). Maybe the CRAY build might
finish in time...
--*greywolf;
--
BSD: No Sh;t!