On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 09:27:40AM -0400, Andrew Brown wrote:
> no.  that would have been silly.  :)

Sure, that's why I didn't understand it :)

> 
> although as i understand it, the major obstacle is that the minor
> numbers are crammed together with no space for more partitions, yes?

Yes.

> that's why i suggested the new major number.

Sure it's a solution, but it's not the best one and I don't think we
have time to implement it before the branch anyway.

--
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI.           Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr
--