Subject: Re: someone mentioned "the 1.5 branch"...
To: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr>
From: Andrew Brown <atatat@atatdot.net>
List: current-users
Date: 06/12/2000 09:04:09
>> what if the b and c device entries for the hard disks went to new
>> major numbers, with the old majors still active for a release or two?
>> surely the drivers don't care...do they?
>
>Why only b and c ? We need a new major number for each supported disk.
b and c is supposed to mean "block" and "character". i have no idea
why was being so terse when i wrote that. and yes, after some more
thought, i can see that it would not just be wd and sd devices, but
also ccd, fd, raid, cd, mcd, and md.
>> or is the major obstacle the size of the disklabel...?
>
>Not really, but with 16 we'll have the problem again soon. We need a more
>generic solution here.
hmph. :(
--
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org * "ah! i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!"
andrew@crossbar.com * "information is power -- share the wealth."