On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Paul Goyette wrote:

# Yup, read_conf_dir_first would be an acceptable name.  Certainly much
# better than my idea of monolithic_conf_preferred !!!  :)

Whatever it is to be called really doesn't matter -- it is the concept
which carries the weight.  Certainly something which is more clearly
understood is preferred...

# 
# On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Todd Whitesel wrote:
# 
# > > # So, either change the name of the variable (maybe to something like
# > > # monolithic_conf_preferred) or change the sense of YES and NO.
# > 
# > I submit that the use of "preferred" is the problem here.
# > 
# > How about "read_conf_dir_first" or something similar?
# > 
# > Either that or include a comment explaining that "preferred" means run last.
# > 
# > Todd Whitesel
# > toddpw @ best.com
# > 
# 
# -----------------------------------------------------------------------
# |   Paul Goyette  | PGP DSS Key fingerprint:  | E-mail addresses:     |
# | Network Engineer|  BCD7 5301 9513 58A6 0DBC |  paul@whooppee.com    |
# | & kernel hacker |  91EB ADB1 A280 3B79 9221 |  pgoyette@juniper.net |
# -----------------------------------------------------------------------
# 
# 


				--*greywolf;
--
BSD: u_long uptime;