joda@pdc.kth.se (Johan Danielsson) writes:
> > you're not supposed to return non-zero unless you "know" (as
> > certainly as you can determine) that you can drive the device.
> 
> But this is what puc does (even though I don't know *what* it matches
> -- what is communications/sub-class 4?)

Somebody pointed this out to me a couple of months ago, and it's
obviously a paste-o.  (I have _no_ idea of what that code could even
_mean_ and I wrote it.  8-)

(COMMUNICATIONS/MODEM i could believe but would still be wrong... but
that's not the right value.)

anyway, yes, that should be fixed.  8-)


cgd