Subject: Re: Tangent: Current-kernel revision naming...
To: David Brownlee <abs@netbsd.org>
From: Andrew Brown <atatat@atatdot.net>
List: current-users
Date: 02/16/2000 15:14:40
>	The 'real' relationship is
>
>		1.3A -> 1.3B -> 1.3C ... -> 1.4 -> 1.4.1 -> 1.4.2
>
>		1.4A -> 1.4B -> 1.4C ... -> 1.5 -> 1.5.1 ...
>
>	Each of these is an independent stream, and the orderings
>	are guaranteed.

that makes less sense to me.  isn't there plenty of stuff in 1.3K that
doesn't go into 1.4, but *does* make it into 1.4A?

-- 
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org             * "ah!  i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown)                that goes *ping*!"
andrew@crossbar.com       * "information is power -- share the wealth."