On Tue, 30 Nov 1999 17:49:18 +0100 
 Feico Dillema <dillema@acm.org> wrote:

 > I'd vote for total removal from the tree. I don't believe it has
 > (many) users left and it is i386 specific or at least little-endian
 > specific (there are bitfields used in it). I don't think there's
 > anybody willing to spend time on it in the future, and scanning
 > the Net for info a year ago it seemed that PINT was quite dead too.
 > So, I'd say get rid of that ugly piece of code in the NetBSD tree,
 > that only seems to cause trouble for users.

I wholeheartedly agree.

        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>