"Perry E. Metzger" wrote:
> Zoularis is actually not very heavyweight EXCEPT for one thing: there
> are ugly hacks in place to deal with the __progname hack. It turns out
> that doing __progname portably is very hard indeed.
> 
> If someone could come up with a better hack for dealing with
> __progname well, we could have our portability library work much more
> smoothly.

BTW, what is the __progname hack ?

Jaromir