In some email I received from Bill Sommerfeld, sie wrote:
> > Notably the last "cc -O .." is missing numerous cc options.
> 
> nope, that's a compile using HOST_CC, where you want to use minimal
> options.. it's building a tool to run on the host architecture, not
> the target architecture..  (which are normally the same, but..)

Shouldn't this be fixed to be consistant with the rest ?

Darren