Subject: Re: CVSup collections for a NetBSD CVS tree
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Michael K. Sanders <msanders@confusion.net>
List: current-users
Date: 05/04/1999 14:00:20
In message <199905041846.LAA04017@Cup.DSG.Stanford.EDU>, Jonathan Stone writes:
>If it's an ``official'' solution, it goes in the tree. Just like sup.
>That means the compiler goes in the tree.
>That means we have to support it.
Wasn't sup distributed separately, back before there was even a NetBSD
package system?