Subject: Re: Philosophy of PAM and rc.d
To: None <seebs@plethora.net>
From: Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
List: current-users
Date: 03/18/1999 09:46:29
On Thu, 18 Mar 1999 seebs@plethora.net wrote:

# Note:  This isn't quite fair.  BSD Authentication solves this problem
# too.  I mean, you still have to hack everything *once*, to change the
# prompting mechanism - but once you've done it once, you can add
# authentication schemes until the cows come home. 

	How many applications support BSD auth out of the box, vs. support
PAM?  For PAM, many of the apps I use (Cyrus, xscreensaver, ssh, etc...)
can be rebuilt with a different commandline option (maybe a patch) and
magically work.  Not so easy with BSD auth.  The main reason I'm
interested in PAM is so that I only have to solve any given problem once
and have the most widespread benefit possible.

--
SA, beyond.com           My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
pub  1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
|    Key fingerprint =  87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6  C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE 
L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________