Subject: Re: 1.3.2 seg fault in shared lib?
To: Michael Graff <explorer@flame.org>
From: Simon J. Gerraty <sjg@quick.com.au>
List: current-users
Date: 03/09/1999 14:39:58
> Every time I've seen this happen you are really stomping on memory
> somewhere, and in the static version the memory isn't as important
> where you are stomping.

Indeed!  I found the problem a while later - missing trailing arg to
one call to a recursive routine (that decrements said arg to limit
recursion), time to update the prototypes :-)

--sjg