On Sat, 07 Nov 1998 13:12:00 +0100  Havard.Eidnes@runit.sintef.no wrote:
> > I see we have support for the 509B in the tree, but it and the
> > Ensoniq board won't do the "right thing".
> 
> I'm sure you mean 905B, right?

Yes; damn, I'm always transposing numbers like that :-)

> Note the "not configured".  That means that there was no matching
> device driver found.  Does your kernel config include the "ex"
> driver, and if it did, did you do a "make clean" before building
> the kernel (just to be sure)?

Nopers; figured the ep driver would support both (if there was a new
rev supported).  Apparently I am way off; the ex driver did wonders!