Subject: Re: Amanda backups: gtar or dump?
To: NetBSD-current Discussion List <current-users@netbsd.org>
From: Greg A. Woods <woods@most.weird.com>
List: current-users
Date: 10/28/1998 23:49:20
[ On Wed, October 28, 1998 at 22:29:01 (-0500), Michael C. Richardson wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Amanda backups: gtar or dump? 
>
> >>>>> "Greg" == Greg A Woods <woods@most.weird.com> writes:
>     Greg> Well, if all you want to do is ensure the data can be read successfully
>     Greg> off the tape then dd is sufficient for testing, and can be faster.
>   
>   I disagree. I did use dd last time. It fails to identify the case that
> the dump ran out of tape, and just aborted rather than notice this case.

Oops.  Yes, that's right.  I don't normally think about the case where
dump aborts because I generally catch that error far before it comes
time to verify that the tape can be read....

-- 
							Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098      VE3TCP      <gwoods@acm.org>      <robohack!woods>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>