Subject: Re: Amanda backups: gtar or dump?
To: NetBSD-current Discussion List <current-users@netbsd.org>
From: Michael C. Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
List: current-users
Date: 10/28/1998 22:29:01
>>>>> "Greg" == Greg A Woods <woods@most.weird.com> writes:
    Greg> Well, if all you want to do is ensure the data can be read successfully
    Greg> off the tape then dd is sufficient for testing, and can be faster.
  
  I disagree. I did use dd last time. It fails to identify the case that
the dump ran out of tape, and just aborted rather than notice this case.

   :!mcr!:            |  Network and security consulting/contract programming
   Michael Richardson |         Firewalls, TCP/IP and Unix administration
 Personal: http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/People/Michael_Richardson/Bio.html
 Corporate: http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/SSW/
	ON HUMILITY: To err is human, to moo bovine.