> Better to do a Q&D job that everyone agrees should be overhauled later, so
> you don't succumb to the paralysis of analysis without something to show
> for it. Besides, you can use the crappy MP solution to compile the good MP
> solution much faster, leaving you more time with which to get it done right.

Actually, I think we can do a not completely inelegant first-try
solution that we know isn't the final solution.   Indeed, my
recollection is that PK was working on this about a year ago - maybe
we should try to talk him into working on it some more.

			       _MelloN_