Subject: Re: Lots of defopt'ing - why?
To: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
From: Paul Goyette <paul@whooppee.com>
List: current-users
Date: 06/28/1998 17:11:06
I always wondered why we called them "defopts" - sounds an awful lot
like "default options", and it confused me for a while, too.  It might
have been nicer to have called them "hdropts" - but of course it's way
too late to change now.  :)

On Sun, 28 Jun 1998, Jason Thorpe wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Jun 1998 00:32:22 +0200 (MEST) 
>  Hubert Feyrer <feyrer@rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de> wrote:
> 
>  > I'm just catching up source-changes from a couple of days, and I see a lot
>  > of former kernel options now being defopt'ed: NFSSERVER, COMPAT_LINUX,
>  > COMPAT_FREEBSD, COMPAT_SUNOS, ... What's the idea behind this? 
>  > 
>  > Wasn't the intention of these options to remove unnecessary code from the
>  > kernel if one didn't need the funcionality? Is it just me who is under the
>  > impression that this optionality is gone now - or am I just missing
>  > something obvious? 
> 
> They're still options... but headers are now generated for them so that
> proper dependencies can be generated on them.
> 
> Jason R. Thorpe                                       thorpej@nas.nasa.gov
> NASA Ames Research Center                            Home: +1 408 866 1912
> NAS: M/S 258-5                                       Work: +1 650 604 0935
> Moffett Field, CA 94035                             Pager: +1 650 428 6939
> 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Paul Goyette      | Public Key fingerprint:    | E-mail addresses:        |
| Network Engineer  |   0E 40 D2 FC 2A 13 74 A0  |  paul@whooppee.com       |
| and kernel hacker |   E4 69 D5 BE 65 E4 56 C6  |  paul.goyette@ascend.com |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------