Subject: Re: nmh versus emacs mh-e?
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Simon J. Gerraty <sjg@quick.com.au>
List: current-users
Date: 05/15/1998 14:55:36
>The NetBSD integration moves mhl and inc and the nmh config files
>around. Even native nmh doens't quite match how mh-e uses mh,
>but with  the NetBSD integrated nmh, the recommended workaround
>doesn't work, at least for me. Has anyone gotten it to work?

I'm using the normal nmh distribution here with mh-e.
I'd have to do some digging to see if I had to change
anything...

The only change I recall making was the correct path for slocal
in my .forward file.

>Failing that, are the patches for mh 6.8.3 still around anywhere?

I wouldn't bother.  nmh was a much simpler solution.

--sjg