Subject: Re: new vfork(2) implementation
To: None <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov, tv@pobox.com>
From: Wolfgang Solfrank <ws@kurt.tools.de>
List: current-users
Date: 01/05/1998 19:39:35 
> Is there any reason sh could be "fixed" to use vfork()?  Considering the
> enormous number of scripts out there that use sh, this could be a big
> performance gain. 

Hmm, I know it's probably only me, but IMHO vfork _is_ a bug.

Ciao,
Wolfgang
-- 
ws@TooLs.DE     (Wolfgang Solfrank, TooLs GmbH) 	+49-228-985800