> 
> Heiko W.Rupp said:
> 
> >Greg A. Woods wrote:
> >|Unfortunately no NetBSD formal release has been truely stable, even, or
> >|especially, on the i386, since 0.9.

Just checking attributions here, did Greg say that? Doesn't sound like 
something he'd say... And snert isn't one of his machines (that I know of)
so he's not one > level back...

> >Yes?
> >
> >snert!265> uptime
> > 4:41PM  up 200 days,  6:56, 4 users, load averages: 1.02, 0.43, 0.28
> >snert!266> uname -a
> >NetBSD snert.pilhuhn.de 1.1 NetBSD 1.1 (SNERT+PPP) #11: Thu Jan 30 11:00:49 MET 

NetBSD is darn stable in -current most of the time. I don't think I've ever
had a problem with a release version that didn't turn out to be my fault
(configuration/hardware).

Any examples to be had here?

								David