> 	Nothing, when done properly, however, I don't quite get how you're
> doing it in this setup.  If you use a normal point to point mask (/30) 
> then you're using four addresses that meet on the proper boundry.  I
> suppose a /31 is possible, but doesn't make a lot of sense.  PPP
> interfaces often will use a /32, but I've never been able to get a Cisco
> to accept that for a netmask. 
 
 You read Matthias mail, did you? He only has two IP-Numbers. No Cisco.

> 	Anyway, proxy-arp does seem to be the answer.
 
 No.

-- 
Markus Illenseer