Hi.

  >thorpej
  >Mon Aug 11 13:03:49 PDT 1997
  >Update of /cvsroot/src/sys/conf
  >In directory netbsd1:/var/slash-tmp/cvs-serv10079
  >
  >Modified Files:
  >      Tag: marc-pcmcia
  >	files 
  >Log Message:
  >Add "device" declaration for the "sm" driver (smc91cxx ethernet).

Why "sm"?  why not "es"?

SMC91Cxx drivers have been existed as "es" in atari (91C90)
and in arm32 (91C92) ports.
(yes, these two seems slightly different...)

Will rewrite these two drivers (as "sm"?? )
using following MI part?

  >thorpej
  >Mon Aug 11 12:52:05 PDT 1997
  >Update of /cvsroot/src/sys/dev/ic
  >In directory netbsd1:/var/slash-tmp/cvs-serv7970
  >
  >Added Files:
  >      Tag: marc-pcmcia
  >	smc91cxx.c smc91cxxreg.h smc91cxxvar.h 

--- kmatsuda
Laboratory of Signal Processing, Section of Informatics and Processing
Research Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University