On Fri, 13 Jun 1997, Ted Lemon wrote:

> > With all due respect, then that is precisely what you should do.
> 
> Speak for yourself, Scott.   I don't want Chris to stop working on
> NetBSD.   I would consider it a catastrophe if Chris stopped working

I think you do Scott a grave discredit by <snip>ing the rest of his
post, where he makes it clear that, like the rest of us, he would rather
have Chris stay with the Project, but that, like several of us have
already said, he does not consider Chris's contributions worth saddling
NetBSD with an unworkable licensing scheme.

> on NetBSD.   Suggesting that Chris's copyright is an attempt at
> self-aggrandizement is completely ridiculous - *nobody* is *ever*
> going to get famous writing code for NetBSD.   If you think otherwise,
> I want to know where you get your weed, because it must be *really*
> fantastic!

This is _exactly_ the sort of ad hominem attack that I objected to in
your last post, albeit on a much more offensive scale.

--
				Jim Wise
				jim.wise@turner.com