"Phil Knaack" writes:
> 	This is OK until Chris decides some company or organization has
> pissed him off and he just reinterprets the license and sues them for
> not emblazoning his name above the name of the software being marketed.

Let me be blunt.

Had certain members of the OpenBSD crowd not been abusive of the old
license, this might never have happened.

It appears that OpenBSD exists for only one reason: "destroy
NetBSD". Well, under those circumstances, you can't expect things to
operate much differently than they have.

Perry