>On Fri, 13 Jun 1997 09:19:27 -0400 (EDT),
>wonko@blackhole.arkham.net (Brian Hechinger) wrote:

>> no it isn't.  it isn't even about NetBSD.  or OpenBSD, or Linux, or 2.11BSD,
>> it's about copyrights, who's wrong and who's right.

>No, it isn't about copyright.  Copyright is obviously owned by the
>author who has written the software, or to whom the author(s) assigns
>the copyright.  No further questions.

>This is about license terms.  I'm surprised that some people are still
>mixing the two even though Chris clearly stated the distinction
>between them.

	You are absolutely right.  I made this mistake too, quite a number
of times.  My apologies.

Cheers,
Phil
--
Phillip F Knaack
Systems Administrator, Information Development for Extension Audiences (IDEA)
Iowa State University Extension