>Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 20:51:01 -0400
>From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>

>Jason Thorpe writes:
>> ...remember, this is NetBSD.  It's not governed by the GPV.  No one said
>> it has to be redistributable in source.  Thus, you don't necessarily
>> need a redistributable compiler.
>
>You mean, a port without a compiler would be considered reasonable by
>people here?
>
>I'm pretty shocked to hear that idea.

Perry, you're not making sense.  What makes you draw the conclusion
that !(redistributable compiler) == !(compiler)?
-- 
Mike Long <mikel@shore.net>                http://www.shore.net/~mikel
"Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands,
hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." -- H.L. Mencken