Subject: Re: gcc-2.7.2.1
To: Chris G. Demetriou <cgd@pa.dec.com>
From: Michael Graff <explorer@flame.org>
List: current-users
Date: 05/14/1997 14:36:40
"Chris G. Demetriou" <cgd@pa.dec.com> writes:

> Actually, why didn't you just go to 2.7.2.2 to begin with.  If the
> differences are only in the configuration files and don't effect
> operation (which i believe they are), then why do we want to say "we
> ship 2.7.2.1" rather than 2.7.2.2?

I was wondering this as well.  I know it doesn't matter, but it is always
a sore point when we lag so far behind in the compiler tools.

I wish we could start using the most recent binutils, too, but that
seems unlikely anytime soon.

--Michael