> > On Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:25:35 -0600 (CST) 
> >  Ty Sarna <tsarna@endicor.com> wrote:
> > 
> >  > So is this the arm32 port? If not, will it be going in the tree? And if
> >  > not, is it really NetBSD? ("The NetBSD that won't be in the tree is
> >  > not the true NetBSD")
> > 
> > Yes, NetBSD/arm32 runs on the StrongARM.  That would be what they
> > are using, from all indications.
> 
> Any particular reason why NetBSD was chosen?

What other choice did they have?

Seriously, what other freely-redistributable UNIX system projects have
well-understood source bases, have the potential for
commercialization, have a well-established track record for keeping
the system rather stable and development carefully steered over time,
and actually run on the ARM?



chris