> Well, some macs have contiguous memory, others have holes...  The macs
> have been using MACHINE_NONCONTIG for some time (0.9 or 1.0, I think).

I hope you are not saying that you are using !MACHINE_NONCONTIG for the
machines which don't have holes.

> If we want to do that, it would make sense to reverse the define to
> be MACHINE_CONTIG and define that on the ports where it isn't used.
> It does make some sense to move all ports to the MACHINE_NONCONTIG
> interface since it would mean one less conditional in the VM system
> and the MACHINE_CONTIG can be represented as a MACHINE_NONCONTIG
> configuration with one bank.

Of course.

May make sense to rename the option.
--
ws@TooLs.DE     (Wolfgang Solfrank, TooLs GmbH) 	+49-228-985800