On Tue, 12 Nov 1996 20:31:28 +0100, Jan-Hinrich Fessel =
<oskar@unna.ping.de> mumbled:
> I specifically meant those:
> Received: (qmail-queue invoked by uid 605); 11 Nov 1996 17:31:14 -0000
> Received: (qmail-queue invoked from smtpd); 11 Nov 1996 17:31:08 -0000
>
> And, yes, I do know what the purpose of Received: should be.
> And, no, I really don't know what those specific headers give me, =
except
> that it looks more or less like someone is fingering with the mail. It
> gives me the feeling the mails have been touched by someone who was not
> supposed to touch them...

There is absolutely nothing wrong with these headers, except that =
bringing them into the usually used Received by: style wouldn't hurt.

Someone (some*thing* to be exact) is always touching your mails on =
netbsd1.cygnus.com, otherwise none of us would see this.  It's debugging =
output even some of the least sophisticated MUA's will weed out for you.  =
If yours doesn't, you can either get used to it or use a different MUA =
;-).

I don't know how to do it in exmh, but I bet there probably is someone =
who can help you out with that.

btw: You cannot trust SMTP mail by definition (almost ;-).  So, take some =
prozac to feed the paranoia and be done with it ;-).

Relax, nothing wrong with this setup.

> Tragbar ist, was nicht herunterfaellt. oskar@zappa.unna.ping.de

;-).. und unertraeglich ist was beim Herunterfallen zerbricht? ;-)

Gruss,
--
Christian Kuhtz <kuhtz@ix.netcom.com>, office: ckuhtz@paranet.com
Network/UNIX Specialist for Paranet, Inc. http://www.paranet.com/
Supercomputing Junkie, et al               MIME/NeXTmail accepted
---- BOYCOTT INTERNET SPAM! See URL http://www.vix.com/spam/ ----