>Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 11:37:12 -0700
>From: greywolf@siva.captech.com (Grey Wolf)

>I don't get it.  I'm wondering what we gain from this move.  It's not
>unreasonable for us to define "unix" or "$ARCH" at appropriate times.
>
>If we fail to define "unix", there's currently a LOT of stuff out there
>which is going to break at compile time, not the least of which is
>X11R6.

That's what NetBSD.cf is for, yes?  You should be able to use:

int unix = 0;

in C code and have it work.  ANSI C says that it *must* work.
-- 
Mike Long <mike.long@analog.com>     <URL:http://www.shore.net/~mikel>
VLSI Design Engineer         finger mikel@shore.net for PGP public key
Analog Devices, CPD Division          CCBF225E7D3F7ECB2C8F7ABB15D9BE7B
Norwood, MA 02062 USA       (eq (opinion 'ADI) (opinion 'mike)) -> nil