On Thu, 29 Aug 1996, James Graham wrote:

> Curiously, why is there an "fsck_ffs"?  Do we plan on fsck'ing any other
> kinds of filesystems?  Do we currently support "fsck_msdos"?  "fsck_xdos"?
> "fsck_ntfs"?  For obvious reasons we don't "fsck_nfs" or "fsck_null"...
> what's that leave us?

I would think we plan to fsck lfs filesystems one day. Regardless, why
spend time renaming it now, just so we can create the risk of spending
time again renaming it later?

cjs

Curt Sampson    curt@portal.ca		Info at http://www.portal.ca/
Internet Portal Services, Inc.	
Vancouver, BC   (604) 257-9400		De gustibus, aut bene aut nihil.